Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Head Neck ; 36(12): 1773-82, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24478238

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prototyping technologies for reconstructions consist of obtaining a 3-dimensional model of the object of interest. Solid models are constructed by the deposition of materials in successive layers. The purpose of this study was to perform a double-blind, randomized, prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of prototype use in head and neck surgeries. METHODS: Thirty-seven cases were randomized into prototype and nonprototype groups. The following factors were recorded: the time of plate and locking screw apposition, flap size, time for reconstruction, and an aesthetic evaluation. RESULTS: The prototype group exhibited a reduced surgical time (43.7 minutes vs 127.7 minutes, respectively; p = .001), a tendency to reduce the size of the bone flap taken for reconstruction, and better aesthetic results than the group that was not prototyped. CONCLUSION: The use of prototyping demonstrated a trend toward a reduced surgical time, smaller bone flaps, and better aesthetic results.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma/surgery , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Models, Anatomic , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma/pathology , Child , Double-Blind Method , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Operative Time , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...